Poultry Welfare
Poultry Welfare and its positive behavioural indicators Dr. Abhijeet Champati Assistant Professor, Department of LPM, Institute of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, SOADU, Bhubaneswar-751003 Corresponding author : [email protected] ABSTRACT There have been growing concerns and awareness among consumers regarding the welfare needs of birds and the source of their poultry products. The concepts of welfare focus on the freedoms and needs of birds as well as their physiological, mental and social well being and also take into account the economics, legality of the rearing systems. It’s the well educated and informed decisions made by the consumers that can promote the all round welfare in poultry rearing.To aid them into better decision making, more research and survey of economical welfare practices in different situations is required.This article reviews the welfare in poultry and its governing behavioural indicators that can help make decisions in management and improve production without hampering the physical and mental health of birds. Keywords: Welfare, Poultry, Behaviour, dustbathing Introduction Poultry birds are commercially grown and raised for their eggs and meat all over the world. Poultry has proven to be the most effective animal product in the world market for producing high-quality protein (Pandey, 2018). The sector has experienced significant expansion and advancement in recent decades, both in India and globally. With a yearly growth rate of 6-7% in egg production and 7-8% in broiler meat, poultry is currently one of the fastest-growing agricultural sectors in India (BAHS, 2023). The rapid advancements in animal genetics, feeding, and management techniques are responsible for this spike in output. This fast growth is also supported by the high stock density intensive rearing viz. deep litter and cages, commercially seeking to maximize profit by application of modern technologies and facilities of management and reduce labout cost and boost productivity. Presently, people are more interested in learning where poultry products come from and how to improve the welfare of the birds. This consequently influences their attitude when making product purchases. The global chicken business has moved away from the traditional cage system and toward more welfare-conscious alternative rearing techniques as a result of these welfare issues. This article examines the notions of wellbeing in the raising of chicken as well as the variety of metrics used to measure it. Concepts of Poultry Welfare Animal welfare is influenced by an animal’s mental and physical health. There are several ways that the housing system may impact the welfare of birds. Researchers that work on animal welfare generally agree that integrating data from various sources using a variety of approaches is the most comprehensive way to assess welfare. (Bhanja and Bhadauria, 2018; EFSA, 2005) Concept of Freedom The five freedoms as applicable to poultry an ideal state of welfare for poultry birds that need to be kept in mind while rearing. These are:- Concept of Comprehensive Approaches A thorough approach to animal welfare was presented by Dockès and Kling-Eveillard (2006), concentrating on four key concerns. The following summarizes them, with implications for the welfare of poultry: Behavioural Indicators of welfare Animal welfare includes an animal’s state of mind and body. A housing system, or rather the environment, can have a number of effects on hen welfare. Therefore, in order to evaluate an animal’s welfare within a specific housing system, a number of indicators, such as the mortality rate, stress, illness and health condition and most prominently behavioural indicators must be taken into account simultaneously. Natural behaviour as defined as behaviour an animal normally shows when exposed to conditions similar to its natural habitat. These are congenial and promote biological functions that are significant to the animal’s welfare. Birds reared in cages often lack the expressions of certain natural behaviour. Tatural behaviours have been listed below. It is linked to aggressive behavior, tonic immobility, aggression, freezing behavior, adrenal cortical activity, and heart rate increase and its impact on the quality of meat. The behavior of cannibalism is harmful to the wellbeing of birds, especially as it results in pain and injury. It has to do with extreme feather pecking, and some authors think that rather than social and natural behaviors, it results from genetic selection favoring individual performance (Bhanja and Bhadauria, 2018). The birds frequently divide into smaller groups when there is room, each with its own set social hierarchy. Particularly in high-density systems where a few dominant individuals may control the feed, water, and available space, social dominance can lead to management issues. When new groups or flocks mix, the dominance hierarchy and the agonistic interactions that go along with it are always restored. Table: On farm welfare assessment of poultry Welfare principles Criteria Assessment Measures Good feeding Absence of prolonged hunger and thirst Assessed at abbatoir or feeder/drinker space Good housing Ease of movement, thermal and resting comfort Plumage condition, litter quality, stocking density, panting, huddling Good health No injuries, disease or pain and distress Lameness, hock burn, foodpad dermatitis, mortality Appropriate behaviour To express social and natural behaviour, human-bird relationship, positive emotional state Avoidance distance test, assessment of qualitative behaviour Conclusion In today’s intense production units, the wellbeing of laying hens is widely acknowledged as a concern. When welfare measures are implemented, the degree of freedom that informed and educated consumers have over their choices may be crucial. Therefore, our decisions about ensuring the welfare of laying hens should be guided by our understanding of the motivations for their behavior and choice of environmental alternative. References Tauson, R.2005. Management and housing systems for layers—Effects on welfare and production. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 61, 477–490 Papageorgiou, M. Goliomytis, M. Tzamaloukas, O. Miltiadou, D.andSimitzis, P.2023. Positive Welfare Indicators and Their Association with Sustainable Management Systems in Poultry. Sustainability, 15, 10890 Campbell, D.L.M. Makagon, M.M.J. Swanson, J.C. and Siegford, J.M.2016. Perch use by laying hens in a commercial aviary. Poult. Sci. 95, 1736–1742 Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics (BAHS), GoI, DAHD. Pp14-23